The war in Ukraine has been reduced to a dangerously oversimplified narrative, framed in the familiar terms of black-and-white absolutes. Our discourse is now saturated with preaching, condemnation, and rigid ideological purity.
On one side, experts and policymakers argue for sustained, massive military aid to Ukraine, insisting that only the total defeat of Russia will secure victory.
On the other, voices contend that halting the war is the only way to preserve Ukraine’s future. Both camps claim to champion Ukraine’s cause.
Donald Trump’s approach has been shattering the established status quo. In the three years since the conflict began, discussions of a ceasefire—or even lasting peace—have never been as prominent as they are now, driven by the new American president’s advocacy for a resolution.
Dread over the unravelling status quo and a profound uncertainty about the future have sparked panic and accusations of Trump’s alleged pro-Russian leanings.
Vladimir Putin’s recent remarks that "initial contacts with the new American administration inspire cautious optimism" further fuel these perceptions.
This article is free at the Tomorrow’s Affairs: https://tomorrowsaffairs.com/how-populism-is-undermining-ukraine-trumps-strategy-and-zelenskys-challenge
Best regards and stay safe,
Iuliia
"No Uranium.."?
An even-handed and nuanced analysis. You shed light on a diplomatic process that may be more complicated than the pro-Russian posturing of the Trump administration would suggest. Let's hope it is.